data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb7d/eeb7dce79abc6182253ce6b5be13fd453ab0efbd" alt=""
I can understand why some introductory economic classes have it for required reading! Unlike the required reading for my Physical Anthropology class, Freakonomics is not a excruciatingly detailed decade long study on the various habits of the spectral tarsier and its environment. It doesn't have graphs, charts, or even a full-fledged explanation of what exactly doing a 'regression' entails. Instead it focused conveying more applicable generalized principles through magnetic good humor; what it does have is a light hearted, if slightly cynical, theories that try to reveal the flaws in conventional-moral thinking. Towards the end, it seemed like every time I opened the book, I was disappointed to find my bookmark so close to the back cover. That doesn't happen often!
More of an exercise of thought than a serious book on how economics works, I'd recommend it to friends as a very entertaining read. The theme of the book: if morality is how we want the world to work, then economics is how the world really works.
(in the above blog I meant no disrespect the the fine required book, The Spectral Tarsier, written by my esteemed Physical Anthropology professor, Dr. Gursky. I find myself riveted by the various graphs, charts, and the full-fledged explanation of all your extensive and thorough tarsier observation and experiment methodologies, data, and clearly entailed conclusions! Truly an impressive collection of information about the often misunderstood tarsier. It's impressive girth and tiny print prevents me experiencing that disappointment outlined above, where I find myself gazing regretfully when I find my wondering 'is the book really going to end already?)
1 comment:
I'm reading this too! Well...in my free time. So I'll have it finished sometime during Christmas break at this rate. I like it so far though!
Post a Comment